Watching
this year's 20th anniversary of Shark Week on the Discovery Channel,
world-renowned marine biologist and shark researcher Samuel Gruber
was shocked to see every myth about the shark's violent nature
come to life on screen. Pandering the lowest common denominator,
the Discovery Channel's coverage of the majestic shark has failed
to educate the public on the shark's true nature and fallen prey
to the public's need to paint the sleek species as blood-thirsty,
brainless killers, he says. Here, he tells us way he fell in love
with sharks - and why we should, too.
"In
this, the 20th anniversary of Discovery's Shark Week, I was
asked to comment on the amazing changes I have witnessed in
shark biology and natural history since I was a young graduate
student in 1960 - and to highlight Discovery's role in those
changes.
So
what you may ask have I seen? First and foremost, I have seen
the "death-fish-from-hell" image of the shark magically
transformed essentially by television documentaries to a crucial
element in the fragile marine ecosystem - at once an aquatic
"Crown of Creation" and ancient "Lord of Time."
The
latter is perhaps a more appropriate moniker for these magnificent
animals but in the 1930s, great ichthyologists called them "Chinless
Cowards" and even offered monetary rewards for anyone who
could prove that a shark ever actually killed any human being!
So our opinion is colored by an abundance of ridiculous myths
from devil to angel and everything in between.
There
is a dichotomy of beliefs about sharks, depending on one's cultural
background. It seems English-speaking or westernized cultures
hate sharks. They have a natural tendency towards revulsion
because of hundreds of years of negative propaganda, more recently
emphasized by movies like Jaws, which portray sharks as horrible
creatures that hold a grudge and would eat a human anytime one
came into view.
On
the opposite side are the peoples of Oceania; Melanesians, Polynesians,
Hawaiian Islanders and New Zealanders, like the Maori, who venerate
the power and majesty of sharks. Perhaps the loveliest myth
is that of the Polynesians who know and revere sharks as Aumakua
or spirit master.
According
to anthropologists Margret Beckwith, the shark is considered
by Hawaiians to be a powerful Aumakua, having the ability to
ensure that its family is always well fed and will never drown.
In
stark contrast, the celebrated fish scientists JLB Smith - discoverer
in 1938 of the most famous of all fish oddities, the Coelacanth,
a true living fossil - proposed in the 1950s that maritime nations
band together and wipe out all sharks.
It
seems that one of his South African acquaintances had gotten
on the wrong side of Jaws and paid the price. Smith, highly
influential in the world of fishes was looking for world-class
revenge. When I read his proclamation a decade later, I thought
how silly -- sharks are as numerous as grains of sand on a beach
and could never be fished out. How wrong I was!
Well,
sharks aren't gods and they're not devils. As I said, I consider
them true lords of time. They've survived multiple extinction
episodes where most animals have disappeared. They've had the
strength and adaptation to come back time and time again, and
they've been around probably longer than most animals with backbones:
half a billion years -- real survivors!
But
now the super-predator, man, threatens to undo the half billion-year
reign of sharks. And the sad fact is that we're just killing
them off to make soup out of their fins!
As
noted, "the only good shark is a dead shark" was the
prevailing western view when I became obsessed with sharks in
1958 after a close encounter with a huge hammerhead while spear
fishing off Miami's Fowey Rocks. Today, half a century later
we see a view so completely different that one wonders how such
shark myths became so fixed in our psyche. But I am getting
ahead of myself.
When
I was a kid in Miami in the late 40s, I was what we called a
water baby!
I
used to go down to the docks and look at every fish that was
brought in. While the other kids were playing baseball, I was
out there looking for sharks, fishes and walking the beaches
for miles collecting sea shells. I taught myself SCUBA diving
at age 12, and when I was a teenager, we used to sail out to
the reefs on an 80' schooner and spend the weekend on the reef,
feasting on the fish we speared.
It
was on one of these trips that I was menaced by a huge Hammerhead
shark. This was the biggest shark I'd ever seen, and since I
was spearing fish, there was blood in the water, which would
suggest that I was in great danger. So I dove back into the
cave with my speared grouper, as the shark swam by - but the
experience instantly changed my career from pre-med to marine
biology. In hindsight, I don't think the shark thought anything
about it.
I
first got into researching sharks through fear and wonder from
this experience, but the more I studied sharks, the more I realized
how amazing these creatures were. For example, I showed during
my doctoral studies that a lemon shark can learn a simple conditioned
response much quicker than a cat or rabbit - and they can remember
such tasks for over a year.
Incredibly,
they also had personalities and different "IQs;" some
were left-handed and some were right-handed. Turns out that
there are all kinds of advanced features about sharks that one
just wouldn't expect. But if you looked at Discovery Channel's
Shark Week today, you'd think they were just horrible death
fish - killer fish that merely eat and breed.
However,
Discovery did not always pander to the lowest common denominator.
When
Shark Week first started up in 1986, we shark researchers thought
this could be our salvation: We could get this man killer-thing
turned around. Over the years Discovery has certainly produced
gorgeous, educational and high quality films! In the 1990s they
spent more time educating the public than frightening them.
But
these days, they seem to be hell-bent on returning to the bad
old days of the only good shark is a dead shark. Shark Week
is just making a mess by engendering the stupid and erroneous
myths about sharks.
I
always tell my students that we need sharks more than they need
us. Fishers say sharks compete with us by eating the same species
we do. But in reality, what sharks actually keep the commercial
fish stocks healthy and under control. What we do is indiscriminately
kill them all, driving many species to the brink of extinction.
The
negative result of killing off hundreds of millions of sharks
is no longer idle speculation. Ecosystems are not just a bunch
of individual animals or species swimming around. There is tremendous
interaction - almost like a weaving or tapestry in which everything
is interconnected. Holding this ecological tapestry together
are the top predators, controlling and modulating the animal
communities below them. If you cut that "thread" of
top predators, the whole system can simply unravel.
It
turns out that sharks do a good job of keeping things in order,
so when you kill off those sharks, things become disorderly.
This is not idle speculation: We already know that in certain
places where sharks were killed off, the coral reefs have begun
to deteriorate because for example the reef-eating parrot fish
are not being controlled.
A
recent article in the prestigious journal Science demonstrated
a direct connection between sharks and the disappearance of
bay scallops. Other such studies are beginning to prove the
importance of top predators, especially sharks in controlling
marine ecosystems.
Today,
a much more enlightened view of sharks prevails as sharks have
come under government protection. The negative image of Jaws
has given way to protection for the feared great white, poster
child for shark conservation; and an industry worth millions
of dollars to just swim with this shark.
Considering
the plight of sharks, it is this story that Discovery and Shark
Week should be focusing on not the worthless and uninformed
myths of the past. One can only hope that Discovery will return
to their role educating not titillating the viewing public."
To
all of my friends and acquaintances!
I officially resigned my tenure at the University of Miami as
of May 31, 2007. But I have not seen any difference in my schedule.
The only difference is that I am doing it all without a salary
(I don't need the money)....teaching, research and mentoring
graduate students. I reckon that I will hang on until my grants
run out in 2011. Then I will officially retire and drive my
Speedster around the country looking for America.
Doc 8.27.07